Velocity change as ammo ages and cast bullets bond to case necks

  • 660 Views
  • Last Post 22 March 2026
Wilderness posted this 14 March 2026

Back in 2021 I had an interesting experience with cast bullets bonding to .30-30 case necks, resulting in substantial velocity increase. I reported this in some detail on Cast Boolits, but do so again here, having had time to reflect on my experience.

The rifle was a Marlin 336A Rippletop, Remington cases, Federal primers, #U321297HP bullets sized to .312”, 170 gns as cast, BAC lube, Benchmark powder.

Edit: Bullets were gas checked and lubed in .323" lube sizer die, then sequentially sized in Lee .314" & .311" dies, with no further lubrication. In the light of later findings, this sizing sequence is important.

Initial shooting was with ammo loaded the night before. First up 24 gns gave 1830 fps for the clean barrel fouler, then 1782 average for the next five shots. Next trip was 26 gns, missed the velocity on the clean barrel fouler, but the group was 1898 fps – up 116 fps for two grains, about as expected. The trip after that was delayed by wet weather, so the ammo was sitting for 10 days before shooting. Load was 27 gns and I was expecting another 50 fps or so. Instead, the clean barrel fouler was 2105 fps and the group 2036 fps – up 158 fps for one grain.

I took the unfired 27 gn cartridges home and pulled them (collet). The first one tried WOULD NOT BUDGE. Then I bumped them in a few thou with the bullet seater preparatory to pulling. Each gave a distinct crack as the bond broke. After that they pulled normally.

Investigating further, I shot some 26 gn loads that had been “aged” five days. This load when shot fresh had averaged 1898 fps.  The same load now “aged”, and refusing to pull, gave 1939 for three shots – another 41 fps just by ageing the ammo five days.

Case neck bonding can be clearly demonstrated either by attempting to pull the bullets with a collet puller, or by applying pressure with the bullet seating die until the bullet moves. A newly seated bullet will seat further without argument. A bonded bullet will at first resist and then let go with a pronounced crack.

In subsequent tests I found that bonding was almost universal, that it could set up in just a few days, that it was not necessarily uniform, that it re-established when reseated ammo was allowed to stand further and retested, and that it happened with all of the lubes I tried except my ersatz version of Speed Green. Lyman Orange Magic appeared to be a partial exception.

The most extreme version of bonding I demonstrated was seating an unlubed bullet in a wiped clean case neck. Using the reseating test, a newly seated bullet would continue to move, while a bullet that had been seated a few days earlier would be almost impossible to move.

This latter finding leads me to speculate that the bonding is actually between brass and lead that have been wiped clean in the various sizing and bullet seating operations. Avoiding bonding would then require a lube that resists such wiping. Alternately, the lube itself may be contributing to the bonding.

As to the effect on velocity, I may have been alerted to the issue by an extreme instance. Retesting with subsonic .30-30 loads did show some effect, but it was small and probably insignificant. Nor have I been able to prove an effect with my full power .30-30 hunting loads using 748, LVR and Varget powders (though not with BAC lube).

Applying the precautionary principle however, I now ensure that all ammo to be tested for velocity, POI etc is aged at least a week before I test. I suspect that not much changes after that first week.

For serious grouping there may be an advantage in loading, or at least completing bullet seating, immediately before use. Alternately lubing with an oversize die and seating in unsized necks may confer an advantage.

You are only as good as your library.

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
John Alexander posted this 14 March 2026

This is amazing!  Metel to metal bonding at room temperature is well known, but my understanding was that it took very clean metal surfaces (no weak surface layers such as oil or wax) high pressures and/or long time periods. Your conditions conform to none of these.

I think I also remember reading about military bullets bonding to the case in stored ammo and causing high pressures (in the 1920s or 1930s) -- maybe in Hatcher's Notebook.  I can't get to my copy right now.

But what you are observing doesn't fit either pattern. I can't wait to see if similar bonding is happening with any old cast bullet load I can find. 

I also hope other members of the forum check to see if their aged CB loads crack if seated slightly deeper.

interesting stuff.

John

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • RicinYakima
  • Wilderness
Ross Smith posted this 14 March 2026

Electrolicis? Alloy? I'll go check some of my '06 loads that have been sitting for years.Lead does oxidize but I don't know how fast. I have a coffee can full of lead balls that are a light grey in color.( Also decades old).

Attached Files

RicinYakima posted this 14 March 2026

The military loads were the "tin can" bullets, tin coated to reduce copper fouling in the bore with the powders they were using. They eventually just put tin powder in the powder, hence the #1/2 number after the four digits. 

I don't think there is enough exposed tin in a lubed cast bullet to bond to the brass case. 

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • John F.
Ross Smith posted this 14 March 2026

Just pulled 3 bullets from my stash of '06 ammo. None were sticky and I didn't observe the crack after pushing one down farther. Just my observation.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Wilderness
  • John F.
Wilderness posted this 14 March 2026

More info:

My case necks are pretty clean. Before sizing I wipe them out. Old RCBS case neck brush is worn out so I have wrapped it with a strip of T-shirt material moistened sparingly with synthetic two-stroke oil and periodically refreshed. Cases are sized with the expander ball in place. Then they are expanded a little more with Lyman M-Die. Net effect of this is a case neck with pretty much everything except residual color wiped out of it.

Bullets for these tests were sized in Lee dies after being lubed in Lyman so, again, the bands would be comparatively clean.

In the original experiments I varied bullet sizing diameter and used both the 30 and 31 M-die plugs to test the effect of neck tension. No effect was observed.

Bullets used with the Benchmark loads were about 16 BHN achieved with diluted linotype. Bullets for subsequent testing were of soft range scavenge material.

Thanks Ross - what was your bullet lube?

You are only as good as your library.

Attached Files

John Carlson posted this 14 March 2026

When testing for seating depth I do re-seat at the range.  I have noted the "crack" you speak of but have not looked for velocity changes.  I have noted that seating more deeply into the lands will produce higher velocity, which may reduce the apparent effect of the bonding.  Will have to dedicate a range trip to checking this out.

Perhaps this contributes to the difficulty in getting the same results we got last time out.

John Carlson. CBA Director of Military Competition.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Wilderness
Wilderness posted this 15 March 2026

I mentioned testing some subsonic .30-30 loads for bonding effect on velocity, group and POI. I just dug out the results.

Bullets were resized (.312") soft WRACo .32-40s - covered in another post about silk purses and sow's ears. Lube was BAC. Load was 5.5 gns Unique. Case necks in this instance had not been cleaned at all, just relying on residual bullet lube to help the expander plugs. Ammo had been sitting around loaded a couple of months. Bonding had well and truly set up.

Comparison was between the aged ammo and the same ammo with the bond broken by seating a few thou deeper - not exactly comparing apples with apples on account of the now slightly different seating depth. Groups were five shots at 50 meters, each preceded by one fouler.

 

               Velocity     SD    Group     POI

Bonded     1022       16      1.91”   -1.55”

Cracked     1000        7      1.19”    -2.16”

 

Make of these results what you will.

You are only as good as your library.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • John F.
Premod70 posted this 15 March 2026

I do know from experience that a jacketed bullet full house load in a 220 Swift that for years never gave any signs of an unsafe load once left loaded for a couple of years before firing did blow up a Ruger 77. It gave higher than normal signs for about ten rounds before one blew. After that incident all my hunting rounds were loaded long and reseated before a hunt. I never kept a load round that was seated to full depth for more than a month and those that were the bullets were pulled and the rounds reloaded as before. I never have this problem with the cast bullets as I only load for match shooting and the case necks are opened to the point the base of the bullets are just touching a bevel in the neck. If I were to assemble lead bullet loads where the cast neck was in full contact with the bare metal of a sized bullet I would do as I do with the jacketed and seat long then reseat at the time I planned to fire them.

Dale Flinchum

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • John F.
Ross Smith posted this 15 March 2026

W. I used white Label on these and I filled all the lube groves, something I don't do now, just the GC gap. Could greasy bullets negate this effect?

Attached Files

Wilderness posted this 15 March 2026

Dale - yes, I too have encountered jacketed bullet bonding when I've pulled .308 ammo that's been standing a while. In my search for info I came across references to jacketed bullet bonding on other sites. Given the short time required for cast bullet bonding to set up, I have accepted it and chosen to avoid freshly loaded ammo when testing for velocity, group, POI etc. The alternative is to seat long and finish seating as ammo is required, but then the leftovers could still be a problem. The question remains whether fresh might be more accurate than bonded.

Ross - which White Label? I found bonding with BAC, and later 2500+, being the only two White Label lubes I had for testing. Other bonders were Lyman Super Moly and LBT. I thought Lyman Orange Magic might have been free of the vice, though I have since experienced a milder degree of resistance to pulling. Given my experience with unlubed bullets it would be interesting if you were to try some of your "GC gap only" bullets.

Since we don't know if the bonding is due to properties of the lube or to the surfaces being wiped clean of lube, another testing option is to apply additional lube to case necks or bullets before loading. The one lube I tested that absolutely avoided bonding was synthetic two-stroke oil and beeswax. Perhaps a sparing finger wipe of two-stroke on the bullets at loading might achieve something. ATF also was untested but could be a possibility. I did try this with lanolin but saw no effect.

You are only as good as your library.

Attached Files

rjmeyer314p posted this 16 March 2026

I had a similar experience with old 256 mag ammo in my Contender. Back in the 1990's I was shooting a lot of woodchucks, and loaded a lot of 256 mags. A couple years ago I found a box of these old loads and took them to the range to shoot. The few I shot all split the case necks. I attributed this to the 2400 powder giving higher pressure with age. I pulled the rest of the bullets and replaced the powder with the same amount of new 2400.  I used the old primers and cases (not annealing them) and bullets. Only.the powder was changed. No more split necks on the next trip to the range.

Attached Files

Ross Smith posted this 16 March 2026

W. White label 2500+. Like I said though, all grooves were filled.

Attached Files

Wilderness posted this 16 March 2026

RJ - I have experienced something similar, but thought it was a different issue.

I have found that brass that has been loaded several times, if loaded and forgotten, will eventually show cracked necks BEFORE it is fired, then more when fired. Most recent example was with .218 Bee, Winchester brass loaded 6 or 7 times, then loaded with jacketed bullets and set aside for a couple of years. I put that one down to hardened brass being left under strain. I have also had it happen with 9x56 - 9.3x57 Norma brass and .358" Norma bullets.

Ross - Another contributor to lubed bullet bonding might be neck tension. My tests covered .003" to .006" (difference between bullet diameter and expander plug diameter). I was unable to test the .000" to .002" range.

You are only as good as your library.

Attached Files

Aaron posted this 17 March 2026

Perhaps the word bond is inaccurate? It could be the bullets and the case neck "set" into their final stressed positions, over time, at the molecular level of the two dissimilar metals. I don't think they chemically "bond" themselves due to a chemical process between the metals. Just a thought.....

 

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

Aaron posted this 17 March 2026

Over time? What time?

I have 25-06 cartridges I loaded in 1986 that have the same zero in the rifle I loaded them for, which I shot last weekend. No difference whatsoever after those cartridges sitting dormant for 40 years.

That was fun too. I hadn't fired that rifle in 20 years. The 75gr varmint loads are still potent! They rip along at 3600fps.

 

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

Wilderness posted this 17 March 2026

Aaron - I found that lubed cast bullets could get a grip within a couple of days. Try an unlubed lead bullet to test this point.

I have no idea of the time scale for jacketed bullets since I have only stumbled over that one by accident, not by test.

And remember we are looking at successive issues here: Does "bonding" occur? And if so does it affect ballistics? The bonding is easy to demonstrate. The ballistic effect is less certain.

Remember also that crimping is sometimes recommended for ballistic reasons, based on the possible benefit of extra resistance to bullet movement post ignition. My observation is that some of the "bonding" I have observed offers more resistance than a crimp.

Please feel free to come up with a better word.

You are only as good as your library.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Aaron
Ross Smith posted this 17 March 2026

W.    My '06 cartridges are sized normally and belled slightly. Bullets are GC'ed and lube sized .310. The cases were tumbled before loading if that matters(clean brass vs dirty brass). Hope this all helps.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Wilderness
Waleone posted this 17 March 2026

Wilderness, thanks for posting this subject, I've been following it with great interest.

This post has brought to mind a phenomenon I have noticed with my cast bullet benchrest firearms. Normally, in these guns I give the brass a minimal neck sizing (just enough to hold the bullet in place, since the cartridge is chambered with my finger). Bullets are seated longer in the case then final seating is accomplished when closing the bolt. I have noticed that occasionally it takes more effort to close the bolt on certain cartridges, but this does not result in a flier when fired. I have not found any variations in case measurements between these cases and ones that chamber without extra effort. This may be a case of bullet to case bonding you mention. I will have to pay closer attention to this phenomenon in the future and observe how much time has passed between loading the suspect cartridges and firing.

FYI, this has occurred with various cartridge and bullet combinations using LBT Blue Soft lube.

Wayne

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Aaron
  • Wilderness
Premod70 posted this 17 March 2026

A side note is most GI rounds at one time were loaded with a tar substance applied to the case neck for both waterproofing and a consistent bullet release.

Dale Flinchum

Attached Files

Wilderness posted this 17 March 2026

Wayne - you could test this away from the rifle if you have a supply of cases.

Suggest loading some dummies, cull bullets, no powder etc. Then at set intervals test one or more with the bullet seater for resistance, with or without the crack. Suggest a day, then 2 or 3 days, then maybe weekly intervals.

Your minimal sizing would be a new frontier in such an investigation, since my testing was all with .003" - .006" neck tension.

LBT was one of the lubes I tested and with it the bullets definitely bonded, though I didn't try to work out how long it took with LBT.

You are only as good as your library.

Attached Files

Show More Posts
Close