• Last Post 02 February 2021
Boschloper posted this 01 February 2021

I have been using poly coated handgun bullets loaded in the 800 to 1100 fps range for several years.  Calibers include .32 H&R, 9mm, .357 Mag., .44 Mag., .45 Auto, and .45 Colts.  I have found these bullets to be equal in accuracy and cleaner shooting than wax lubricated bullets.  Today, for the first time, I tried my deer hunting .44 Mag. load with poly coated bullets.  The test handgun was a Ruger Super Blackhawk Hunter with a Nikon Force XR 2X scope.  The load was Lyman 429421 cast from scrap lead and coated with Eastwood Mirror Red over 23 grains of W-W 296 and a CCI 300 primer.  The course of fire was 6 shots off the bench at 50 yds. (2.8" group), then 38 shots at an 18" diameter gong at 200 yds. (5 shots to get the hold-over, then 31 hits and 2 misses.) then one more 6 shot group from the 50 yd. bench (2.5").  Temperature was 21 degrees F. and the wind was gusting up to 15 m.p.h.  (New Hampshire at it's finest.)  Once I was home and warmed up, I cleaned / inspected the gun, and found a few grains of un-burned powder and the typical soot that you see on a stainless gun after firing a box of ammo thru it.  There was no lead or poly coat in the chambers, forcing cone or bore.  The 2.8 and 2.5" groups are consistent with what I have seen from this gun with wax lubed bullets using both 296, and 4227.  Based on the results of this test, I am satisfied that I can use poly coated bullets for hunting (1400 fps) as well as casual target shooting and plinking (800 to 1100 fps).

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
OU812 posted this 02 February 2021

So Poly coat is the same as Powder coat? Are some brands better than others.

Attached Files

max503 posted this 02 February 2021

Thank you very good report.

Attached Files