Did the search thing and couldn't find any direct comparisons of Alum.vs copper GC's. Soooo, has anyone done a direct accuracy test between both types ??? Gator Checks in 22 & 30 seam to be non existent, so I'm looking for other options
Gas Checks,Alum VS Copper
- 10K Views
- Last Post 28 April 2013
I have used high volumes of Hornady, Gator copper checks and Aluminum checks from our member here Sagesoutdoors.com. I find no difference in results. Early on I had read that Aluminum checks may leave aluminum fouling in chrome lined bores but I have proven to my satisfaction after thousands of rounds, that is false and the Aluminum checks do not foul chrome lined bores with Aluminum and those negative comments about Aluminum checks came from a person with a conflict of interest who stood to gain financially from reducing the sales of Aluminum checks.
Gary
Attached Files
I have done a lot of research work on gas checks over the last couple of years and have come to the conclusion that when making your own from alum. it is best to use material of at least 3xxx series. Lithography plate is good. Most flashing material is 1xxx series and more a lot of applications is too soft.
Cheers from New Zealand
Attached Files
I've been using AL checks from sages outdoors for a while now and find that they work just as well as copper. James Sage is a great guy to deal with & stands behind his products.
Pat
If someone else had of done to me what I did to myself . . . I'd have killed him. Humility is an asset. Heh - heh.
Attached Files
Thank you all, Pat, do the Sage checks have the “crimp-on” barb on the inside or just straight sides like the Lyman, I should say the OLD lyman GC ??
Attached Files
I'll grab that question with a picture
- #Permalink
- 0
- 0
Attached Files
I have done a lot of research work on gas checks over the last couple of years and have come to the conclusion that when making your own from alum. it is best to use material of at least 3xxx series. Lithography plate is good. Most flashing material is 1xxx series and more a lot of applications is too soft.
I'm just starting with home made aluminium checks. I have high hopes as I received a free Freechex II in .357 and have a large stash of rolled aluminum flashing. When you say “too soft” I can understand that, but what is the effect on performance? Fouling? Inaccuracy? I'm thinking it's gotta handle pressure better than a plain base at least. I will go ahead with my trials with .357 Magnum 1894c Marlin and .35 Remington Marlin 336 but am interested in what the softer (free for me) flashing has done for others. Heck, people double up beer can material.
Attached Files
I've read the opposite about the aluminum for checks that softer is better. I've seen annealing recommended for aluminum to make the cutting and forming easier on the tools. Just try what aluminum you have , if the thickness is near the upper limit for your tool and the aluminum is too hard, it is going to crack and tear.
Gary
Attached Files
This is an interesting topic for me to learn from.
I have been unable to get a good cooper GC fit on some of the shanks of my various 25 cal bullets used in 25-20Win-'92. So I gave James Sage's product a try. Not knowing he had choices in thickness and shank size I just ordered the stock offering. The first bunch that came fit one mould but not the others and he and I talked about fit via email.
James went far out of his way to get me a bunch of sample checks of various size and long story short, through trial application, I now have a source of checks for all the various bullets in 25 I play with in this rifle and now know what to order next time.
In my very limited testing I believe the aluminum checks provide as much accuracy as I can discriminate from the test rifle. In other words, I think they are fine for what I am doing.
I think it would take a very accurate bench rifle and known load to see how cooper v aluminum compare.
Attached Files
Another tip I've read is that even if you have just the right design thickness to fit your tool and your bullet shank size that you can end up with checks that are loose if the aluminum is too hard. This happens because the harder aluminum has more spring back after the checks installed to the bases of your bullets.
That is the worst I've heard about making your own checks and the cure is simple. You take the strips you've cut for your tool, hold one with a tweezers and run it through the flame of a torch or your kitchen stove gas burner. This will draw the temper from the aluminum so it will have less spring back after installing the checks and they will be tighter.
Gary
Attached Files
There are a couple of critical factors when making and using GC's.
1) The GC must be made to fit the shank and the material must fill the void between shank and final sizing diameter. Formula is T = (SD - ShD)/2 where T is the minimum thickness of the material, SD is the sizing diameter and ShD is the shank diameter.
Eg: T = (.314 - .284)/2 T = .030/2 T = .015
Given the above I would be inclined to find some .016 material to ensure a good form and fit.
2) The material must be suitable for the use. Charlie of Freechex has found that very soft (eg: 1XXX series) alum with gall a die and I have found that soft alum (eg: deodorant cans) does not shoot accurately. Lithography plate in NZ is 3XXX series and works VERY well as does a batch of 3XXX series ribbon I bought from Yonky in the UK.
Hope this helps. YMMV.
Cheers from New Zealand
Attached Files
I have been using painted aluminum flashing with good results. It is about .014” I have coils of the stuff Jeff mentioned from Yonky. I haven't tried it yet but it looks good. I haven't done side by side testing but I really can't tell the difference between copper and aluminum in my rifles. I've shot long strings of the home-mades through a couple of self-loaders and they work fine for me.
Attached Files
Lithography plate, OK for those of us unenlightening where you you find/get this material? I did a google search and came up with wholesale suppliers which would be a little over kill for my meagre needs. :-)
Attached Files
Litho plates? the best price for those is from a dumpster behind a print shop, or ask the receptionist.
Gary
Attached Files
Yes, litho plate is dirt cheap at the scrap dealer. I bought a sheet that would be 8 square feet for $3.00. Worked out it would make 10000 checks!
Cheers from New Zealand
Attached Files
Range tested comparison loads yesterday with alum. vs. copper gas checks in a Marlin 1894c .357 Magnum. Identical loads using Lee 158 SWC/A2400. They shot the same. I got a Freechex II and will be going thru my .35s checking out the home made checks. I'd like to really push this bullet in a .35 Rem. Marlin 336, we'll see. EDIT; The aluminum came from .011” rolled flashing.
Attached Files
More tests comparing copper vs. aluminium gas checks; yesterday I shot the same loads as above in my 6” S&W M19, Lee C358-158 SWC over full charge of A2400. I couldn't tell any difference in the groups or anything else. These loads really have some snap, much more than my usual stuff, but I wanted a test. Clean load, no unusual fouling. Accuracy was as good as I can hold off bags using factory sights, easy 2” for 6 both at 25 yds. My conclusion is aluminium gas checks are aok, but you have to really be motivated to make them. I'd like another Freechex II in .30 cal. just for the peace of mind of knowing it's there.
Attached Files
There was a debate on Cast Boolit site about the possiblity of bore damage caused by the possible presence of aluminum oxide on the sheet stock.Some claim that it is so minute that it shouldn't matter and some say they would never use aluminum checks. I'm still waiting for my 44cal checkmaker from Patmarlin to try aluminum checks.
Attached Files
It is probably not worse than the silicon dioxide used in the primers. WFIW, Ric
Attached Files
It is probably not worse than the silicon dioxide used in the primers. WFIW, Ric
Attached Files
If the aluminum was oxidized, I think that it would be worse that any material in the primer as the gas check would be in contact with the bore. Aluminum oxide is very abrasive.
Attached Files
Categories
- All Categories
- General Polls
- Contact Us w/ Forum Issues
- Welcome to The Cast Bullet Association Forum
- General
- Bullet Casting
-
Guns and Shooting
- AR Platform
- TC Contenders & Other Single Shot Handguns
- Shotguns
- Informal Matches & Other Shooting Events
- Gunsmithing Tips
- Gun Cleaning & Maintenance
- Optics
- Benchrest Cast Bullet Shooting
- Military Bench Rest Cast Bullet Shooting
- Silhouette Shooting
- Postal Match Cast Bullet Shooting
- Factory Guns
- Black Powder Cartridge
- Hand Guns
- Lever Guns
- Single Shot Rifles
- Bolt Action Rifles
- Military Surplus Rifles
- Plinkers Hollow
- Muzzleloaders
- Hunting
- Reloading
- Buy, Sell or Trade
- Other Information & Reference
Search
This Weeks High Earners
- Ed Harris 9
- Glenn R. Latham 5
- barra 2
- Aaron 2
- 44 WCF 2
- 45 colt guy 2
- Lucky1 1
- Ken Campbell Iowa 1