Chamber Issue

  • 119 Views
  • Last Post 1 hour ago
Aaron posted this yesterday

I noticed that while seating cartridges into my 1885 High Wall in 45-90, the cartridges, with cast bullets, needed a thumb push to seat them the last .2 inches in the breech. Not having any factory ammunition with which to chamber and see the difference, I assumed the bullet diameter was the cause. Combined with no throat possibly, seating was always accomplished with a slight thumb push for the final .2 inch of travel. (that's 5mm for my Metric friends).

 Black magic marker on the bullet and case mouth revealed no interference with the chamber or any area whatsoever causing the failure to "drop in" the chamber with gravity alone. I was stymied and figured the thumb push was going to prevail with my cast bullets. Know that I did not discover the thumb push right away and assumed my cast bullets were too large (length and/or diameter) to allow seating. In frustration one day, I pushed the cartridge into the chamber to get some rifling marks in the bullet to show me the distance I would need to deep seat the bullet and allow gravity to chamber the round. 

 To my amazement, no rifling marks of any kind were on the bullet. I then went a got a new cartridge case from the box, sized it in the sizing die, and inserted the empty cartridge case in to the breech. Lo an behold, the case needed to be pushed into the breech the final 5mm of travel. Magic marker on the same brass case at the mouth revealed no rubbing or interference on that end.

 I light bulb went off in my feeble brain when I was chambering a bore riding, paper patched bullet into the breech, and a thumb push was needed to seat it. What the heck? 

 The rear of the CHAMBER at the breech end is just a tad tighter and necessitates the thumb push to seat the cartridge. Using 45-70 brass and factory 45-70 cartridges in the chamber was the same. Thumb push required. I can't believe how this misled me and had me working on the wrong end of the cartridge. The new .458 and .457 size dies were money misspent in trying to solve this mystery. 

 I know you are thinking a chamber cast would have revealed the issue but:

  •  I am bad at making chamber casts
  • I would have been measuring the wrong end of the cast and seen that the throat went halfway to the muzzle.
  • Getting the chamber cast all the way to the base (breech end) of the chamber is a real issue when the stupid metal flows out of the breech into the action area.

So now I once again say that I learn something each and every day. This rifle simply has a TIGHT breech end and a thumb push will be need to seat cartridges.

I will live with the thumb push to fully seat the cartridges and know I have a really good breech seal with this rifle!

 

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Ken Campbell Iowa posted this yesterday

a big attraction to shooting cast is the never ending supply of things that make you say " geepers " ....  

ken

Attached Files

sluggo posted this yesterday

Hello: Glad to see you found out what was going on with the 45-90. I am not sure but was this the same discussion that involved the MP bullet mold. If so did the mold turn out not to be the culprit ? I was going to order that mold and held off after reading your earlier posts. Thanks, take it easy.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Aaron
Aaron posted this 19 hours ago

The Marlin 45-70 was and still is the main rifle affected. It has no throat. This rifle is not affected and will chamber the cartridge with the bullet seated to and crimped in the bullet crimp groove. There is no need to deep seat the bullet in the Uberti 45-90 High Wall. I think that mold is on sale right now too. 

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • sluggo
Aaron posted this 18 hours ago

As an aside, I also discovered my RCBS .458 size die isn’t .458”. It’s actually sizing to .459 unless I am getting springback on the sized bullets. I will need to examine that more closely. They do plop from the mold at .461” so springback may be the situation…..

Geepers!

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • sluggo
Aaron posted this 18 hours ago

Sluggo,

The affected rifles are the Winchester (Miroku) 1886 in 45-90 and the Marlin (Ruger) 1895 Lever Action in 45-70. Their throats are too short and the bullet needs to be seated deeper. The Uberti 45-90 High Wall and the T/C Contender 45-70 chamber it fine seated to and crimped in the crimp groove. 

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

Aaron posted this 18 hours ago

Sluggo,

The affected rifles are the Winchester (Miroku) 1886 in 45-90 and the Marlin (Ruger) 1895 Lever Action in 45-70. Their throats are too short and the bullet needs to be seated deeper. The Uberti 45-90 High Wall and the T/C Contender 45-70 chamber it fine seated to and crimped in the crimp groove. 

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • sluggo
sluggo posted this 15 hours ago

Thanks Aaron. I will be casting for a old trapdoor springfield and remington rolling block. I think they should be OK for the MP mold. I want a mold that is a little easier on the shoulder than my current one. Thanks again, mike

Attached Files

Aaron posted this 13 hours ago

Mike,

Sorry about the previous rambling. I was using my iPhone at 2 in the morning. I bought that mold primarily for the Marlin Lever Action which it is impossible to use in there due to its lack of throat and almost no leade. On a whim I tried it in the 1885 and the tight chamber situation fooled me. It does seat in the 1885 with a slight thumb push. It also doesn't fit the chamber of the 1886 45-90 due to that rifles short throat. Darn.

I have not tried it in my Sharps (45-70) rifle yet because that's not the bullet configuration I shoot in that one. Not working in the two lever action rifles was a disappointment for me. MP Molds could really improve that bullet by reducing the nose diameter forward of the crimp groove. Oh well. 

My bullets fall from the mold at .461" with Lyman #2 alloy. I size them to .458 and the other day noticed that they were .459" and I have been shooting them that way. I ordered a new size die in .458 and .457 thinking the die was incorrect but now suspect the .459 measurement may be caused by bullet springback after sizing.

The lessons keep rolling eh? I'll go size some today with the new die and see what gives.

 

If you get the bullet mold, let us know how it works in your rifles. 

With rifle in hand, I confidently go forth into the darkness.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • sluggo
sluggo posted this 1 hour ago

I will give that mold a try as soon as the eagle s!!ts. I have a browning 1886 in 45-70 that I have only shot jacketed loads in. I might be tempted to try some cast from this mold in. But first things first. Thanks again for the help.

Attached Files

Close