Some background.
I have the RCBS 45-201KT and RCBS 45-255 molds. First I tried the 201 with 4.5 Bullseye and and 4.0 of WST. But with no crimp groove in the bullet, I suspect the accuracy suffered. The 201 was probably intended for the 45 ACP.
The 255 (257-grains) was tried also with 3.5, 4.6, 3.7 and 4.0 Bullseye, as well as 4.0 WST. Accuracy was OK, but not great.
I told my friend I was going to buy a new mold. He gave some bullets to try. An Ideal 457127 round nose and a Lee SWC. There I again tried 3.5 and 4.0 WST and 4.6 TG. The Lee weighs 218 to 223-grains. (For some reason he has large selection of Lee multi cavity (gang) molds.
I use the revolver to shoot Postal matches, 50-feet, standing, with a two hand hold. (This goes back to 2019.) My best results were with the Lee SWC and
4.6-grains of TG. So looks like Aaron’s comment is right on.
I was “fishing” because the #454524 @ 261-grains is heavier than the Lee @ 218-grains, suggesting that 4.6-grains (or less) of TG might be worth considering.
I have to thank John Alexander, past president of the CBA and frequent contributor here, for me having TG (Tite Group) on the shelf. He was using TG in his .22 rifle and I was messing with my XP-100 in .22 BR, so I tried TG in that gun.
I have a little Bullseye available (thanks Larry) but I just want to try something “unordinary”.
Thanks!