Heat Effect on a Bore Rider’’s Nose Diameter

  • 359 Views
  • Last Post 08 November 2023
Wm Cook posted this 04 November 2023

Can the temperature of the alloy and/or mold temperature (independent variables) make a dimensional change to the nose diameter (dependent variable) of a bore rider bullet? 

Or to put it another way, will varying the alloy temperature or mold temperature change the diameter  (+/- .000x) on the nose of a bore rider bullet?

I’m seeing what looks to be .0002 - .0004 difference in my castings from a mold running @ 375 vs 430 degrees.  I’d appreciate your input.  Thanks, Bill C.

ps: Regarding .308 SR brass & .308 LR brass; My Lapua Palma brass came in this week and I should have first impressions of velocities, SD’s with like charges fairly soon. Ironically as all hell, the brass came in the same day that Midway notified me that LR primers we’re available for the first time since Covid.

 

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Bud Hyett
  • Ken Campbell Iowa
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Bud Hyett posted this 04 November 2023

According to the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, there is a .0001 increase in volume for each one degree Fahrenheit rise in temperature for (pure) Lead in the liquidus state. In my experience with molds, this is correct.

This is influenced by alloys, antimony is the only metal that increase when cooling. With the antimony going out while the lead and tin are coming in as it cools, your figures are probably close.

Farm boy from Illinois, living in the magical Pacific Northwest

Attached Files

Idahocaster posted this 06 November 2023

Higher mold temperatures will cause the mold cavity to be slightly larger, but may not cast good bullets. Then there is the matter of maintaining the high mold temperature too.

Attached Files

linoww posted this 07 November 2023

" .0001 increase in volume for each one degree Fahrenheit rise in temperature for (pure) Lead in the liquidus state. In my experience with molds, this is correct"

 

how in the heck do you accurately measure this!

"if it was easy we'd let women do it" don't tell my wife I said that!

Attached Files

Bud Hyett posted this 07 November 2023

".0001 increase in volume for each one degree Fahrenheit rise in temperature for (pure) Lead in the liquidus state. In my experience with molds, this is correct" 

How in the heck do you accurately measure this! - In a controlled temperature laboratory room with calibrated equipment. The value is measured over a range of temperature measuring the amount of heat put into the sample and then measuring the resultant dimensional increase. In some of the more exacting measurements, the sample is put in the room and left alone for 48 hours to stabilize the sample with the ambient room temperature. 

In college in a Physical Chemistry course, we did this work with a steel bar to acquaint the class with the principle. The settings were crude, but effective. A sample bar was rigged with an electric current and a buzzer. The bar was heated until the bar expanded enough to close the circuit and the buzzer went off. The temperature of the bar and the length of the bar were measured, then we calculated the "ratio of expansion".

Farm boy from Illinois, living in the magical Pacific Northwest

Attached Files

lotech posted this 07 November 2023

I'd shoot enough groups to show some meaningful results. I doubt your variances will matter, but that's only a guess. Formulas are great for some purposes, but groups are the final answer. 

Attached Files

pat i. posted this 07 November 2023

Bud all the scientific stuff and lab work is above my pay grade but if I'm reading it right you're saying that a 1 degree temp change translates to a .0001 dimensional increase. That would mean a 20 degree temperature swing would be a .002 variance in diameter and length. I have to be misunderstanding what's being said cuz that ain't happening. Also wouldn't the liquidus state be the temperature where the alloy is completely liquid. Is so that would be a pretty hard thing to measure. Pretty hot too I'd imagine. Bill, pick a temperature where you're throwing good bullets and work with it. Measuring mold temperature, worrying about a couple of 10ths, and all the other things people get wrapped up worrying about is like asking how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

Attached Files

Bud Hyett posted this 07 November 2023

Bud all the scientific stuff and lab work is above my pay grade but if I'm reading it right you're saying that a 1 degree temp change translates to a .0001 dimensional increase. That would mean a 20 degree temperature swing would be a .002 variance in diameter and length. I have to be misunderstanding what's being said cuz that ain't happening. Is so that would be a pretty hard thing to measure. - I missed a decimal point in my original reply. The value is .00001 inch. Thanks for catching this.
Also wouldn't the liquidus state be the temperature where the alloy is completely liquid. - Liquidus is the state of transformation where the element changes from solid to liquid within one degree. Alloying the lead changes this point and even adds factors to the state of transformation. The best common example is water where water is both liquid and gas at 212 degrees Fahrenheit. an additional 540 calories of heat are needed to make steam from one gram of the liquid water. 
Bill, pick a temperature where you're throwing good bullets and work with it. Measuring mold temperature, worrying about a couple of 10ths, and all the other things people get wrapped up worrying about is like asking how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. - I concur. Adding in the alloy aspects of the different elements in the alloy plus antimony is the only element that expands as it cools makes it hard to control these minute factors. Consistency of the pot temperature and consistency in the rhythm of casting are what I've found to bring the most consistent bullets.  

Farm boy from Illinois, living in the magical Pacific Northwest

Attached Files

pat i. posted this 07 November 2023

"Consistency of the pot temperature and consistency in the rhythm of casting"

Not to mention the consistency of your micrometer temperature, consistancy on how hard or soft you bring the measuring faces together, and a host of other things that could effect things when you're measuring down in the low tenths.

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Bud Hyett
OU812 posted this 08 November 2023

Bumping corrects all those very minute measurements. Bumping is so rewarding, NOE should sell dies for this purpose. Would that hurt his mould sales?

Attached Files

OU812 posted this 08 November 2023

Here is a simple boreride design that can be bumped and fitted to throat by sanding undersized die to fit. Notice bumped bullet on right has a more uniform nose also...cast parting line has vanished

Attached Files

Wm Cook posted this 08 November 2023

pick a temperature where you're throwing good bullets and work with it. Measuring mold temperature, worrying about a couple of 10ths, and all the other things people get wrapped up worrying about is like asking how many angels can dance on the head of a pin

Keith you're probably right about bumping.  But I'm a few lessons short of getting there.  Pat, Bud you are right about nit picking nuances that doesn't mean diddly.  In the case of the relationship of mold temp to nose diameter I wasn't looking to improve accuracy as I was to understand bullet to bore fit.  I'm new to this but never saw anything that showed that relationship.

Two years ago what I knew about freebore diameter, leade, bore diameter, bullet to bore fit could have fit in a thimble. I had been casting for decades but never even considered cast benchrest accuracy.  Rifles shot as they shot and I left it at that.  

In jacketed benchrest all we did was have one of a dozen or so smiths that were dedicated to jacketed benchrest and have them chamber up a couple, three barrels at a time.  Then we'd go to the shelf and keep shooting the same jacketed custom bullets and the same lot of powder we'd been shooting for the past half dozen barrels.  All we adjusted was powder charge and olgive to case base.  Other than finding jam depth and then backing off it a few thousands at a time bullet to bore fit wasn't part of my world.

A year ago February I got a big boost from Jim S about casting bullets for match accuracy.  At the time started using a clock with a sweep second hand so that I could get a proper cadence.  It helped more than I could ever thank him for.  That led to figuring out why bullets cast on Monday were a consistent +/- .3 grains but on Tuesday it may have crept up a few grains but still held a consistent +/- .3 grains.  That led me to finding out that if I held the mold temp consistent during a run, say 400 degrees, I could drop bullets close to the same weight Monday or Tuesday.  Will it help accuracy? Probably not, but I have a lot of knowledge gaps that I have to fill.  I am not recommending new cast accuracy shooters go to this length because it is not necessary.  I did what I did because I had to prove to myself what effects the bullet's shape and weight.

Not that any of this matters because if you separate your casting sessions and shoot groups from the batch that was cast none of my effort was worth it. And in fact if you shot bullets from the same casting lot that were +/- .1g vs +/-.4g I have serious doubts that it would matter a hoot.  John doesn't sort and Larry doesn't need to sort because their skill level with casting has been honed for decades.  I'm new so I have to put in the time to learn some of these things for myself.   

All this work did teach me way more about bullet to bore fit than I knew a year ago.  After a lot of trial and error I think I have bullet to freebore dimension figured out.  Same with gas check to case neck.  Bullet to bore could be corrected as Keith described but I'm not equipped to get to where he's at at this time.

I'm about half way to where I understand bullet to bore fit for bore rider type bullets.  All I can do is give it a good guess.  And that's if you can feel the drag on the nose of the bullet as you chamber but are still able to easily extract a loaded round you're have a decent fit that will not hurt you.  Conversely if you feel no drag on the lands the small nose diameter may or may not effect accuracy.  If you chamber a round and before the bolt comes within .25" and you feel a drag and are then unable to extract the round easily you are too tight, pressure builds and you shoot patterns. Paul's article in FS 268 helped me here.

If you combine that with a seal on the front driving band into the freebore you have the basics fore starting the bullet off in the right direction. 

I can feel the difference in how a loaded round chambers in my rig with an undersized nose.  But I don't think that +/- .0003 would make any difference in accuracy.  Its like walking down a hall with the lights off. If you don't brush against the side once in a while you don't know how much clearance you have on either side. 

Once you've developed consistent practices for casting consistent weights and consistent dimension (about the same thing) you can move on to other lessons.  You guys must think I'm hopeless.  I appreciate your patience.  Thanks for the help.  Bill.

 

Note: Regarding SR .308 brass.  My chronograph battery went dead today before I got to far on the .308 Winchester SR vs LR brass.  But I did get a couple of 5 shot strings comparing SR to LR using IMR4227 and a 206 grain bullet and they ran 1720 vs 1723 and SD of 8.7 and 8.8.

 

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Eutectic posted this 08 November 2023

Yes, the mold expands when heated. I was curious about this and ran the calculations. Relative expansion coefficients aluminum 23, brass 19, iron 10.

An aluminum mold casting ~0.451 inch bullets cavity diameter increases 0.0014" at 400 F (frosted bullets) than at 300 F (shiny bullets). An iron mold will have about half the increase.

The alloy shrinkage is another factor. ALL lead alloys shrink, more tin and antimony = less shrinkage.

In reality, there is size variation in a casting run despite all efforts to control the variables. So we must size after casting and bumping may be the best answer in some cases.

Steve

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Bud Hyett
Close