Case Capacity, Powder Position in the Case & Accuracy

909 Views
Last Post 15 October 2023

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 07 October 2023

Since August I've been fighting a problem that has a powder, charge and bullet combination that'll agg in the .8's (my range, hand picked conditions, not implied in any manner that it could be replicated in match competition) some of the time but triple that other times with a production class .308 Savage.

When the load goes south it shoots as a pattern, not as an odd flier or two. And it can go from group to pattern quickly. And within the same range trip I've had it go South and come back North again before the end of the day. Its like every time I go to shoot a group I don't know if it'll be a group or a pattern. Best example I can give is its like the stem on your front rest isn't tight and the POI is wandering around. But bench equipment and bench practices are solid.

Below is an example which is typical of what I've seen many times these past three months. There were two other groups shot between the group on the left and the group on the right in the picture below. Ironically it just so happened that each group was shot with the 8th through 12th shot after barrel cleaning. The group on the left was the 7th group of the day and the group on the right was the 10th group of the day. Both are the same load shot in the same conditions. Side note: I load at the range in increments of 5 to 10 shots at a time as much to keep the barrel cool as it is to tweak the load.

Could it be the burn rate of the powder and the lay of the powder within the case?

All the powders I'm working with (fast to slow IMR4227, 5744, N130, 4198 and H4895) have a fill capacity in the 43% to 47% range with a 220 grain bullet running 1700 to 1780fps. All are extruded powders. I started using 5744 n the early spring after it showed some promise. I went back and bought a jug's worth of the same lot of powder. Far and away, the 5744 out shot all other powders that I've tried by a factor of 2. That said, powder is one of the few things left to tinker with.

If anyone has any thoughts on issues with the % of case capacity being used or the effect the powders position in the case many have on accuracy I would appreciate your thoughts. Thanks, Bill Cook.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

46 Comments

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes

CBA Member

muley posted this 08 October 2023

with that bullet weight and the 1-10 twist try 30-33 of varget for a start. or 28-30 of vv135 in 1/2 grain increments

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

MP1886 posted this 08 October 2023

Funny that it happens from the 8th to the 12th shot after a barrel cleaning. Makes me think cleaning the barrel has to do with it. You know many say you must season the bore after cleaning and the arguing begans with just how many shots do you have to shoot to season a bore? One friend says over 200...hmmmmmm

Attached Files

CBA Member

pat i. posted this 08 October 2023

I'd lose the 5744 too. I thought it was going to be my savior with this 06 plain base thing I'm playing with but not the case, a lot of unburned powder left behind. I agree with Muley here and would probably start around 25 grains of Varget and work up, its probably cheaper than 135 or used to be and thats a good thing. You could also do yourself a favor and search the national match reports to see what the good PRO class shooters are using. Might require a new mold and change of powder but you'll be one step ahead of the crowd.

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

OU812 posted this 08 October 2023

I had best accuracy using Reloader 7 in my 308...no vertical stringing from what i recall. Vertical stringing is usually caused by powder positioning inside case.

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 08 October 2023

Has anyone had any experience with using Dacron filler with the slower "fast" burning powders? 4227, 4198, 4895, 5744?

The way the problem switches off and on confuses the heck out of me. For the life of me, when it shoots a pattern, it seems like I'm loading and shooting with each of the five cartridges with powder charges varying +/- a grain and a half. On an old thread I remember someone doing something like the NRA roll (?) or something like that where the cartridge is rotated before chambering. Can't remember exactly what thread that was.

Since I'm new I've been taking bullet to bore fit 101 for the past year. I have a Lyman 311299, three of Accurate's Egan design (230E / 219g) and a couple other of his conical tapered shape (220G & F / 206g). The bullet to bore fit on the mid sized 230E feels good but I have more to learn about fit than most of you forgot in the last two weeks.

Varget and N135 are on the shelf but I never gave them a fair chance. The initial velocities I worked up for each had a SD over 30. I'm not married to low SD but shied away from those two just because I had a half dozen powders that had SD's in the mid teens or lower. Next trip out I'll give IMR4227 a go.

Here are the numbers for the .308 Winchester cartridges that were shot in the last three Nationals. Sort is by powders used. There are repeat users in these numbers where come shooters used the same powder multiple years.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Standard Member

OU812 posted this 08 October 2023

I taper bumped all my test bullets 1.5 degree included, so accuracy was pretty good with alot of powders and bullets (4759, 4198,4895,varget,rel 7,2400 etc).

Rel 7 was most accurate in my rifle. I we lived closer I would give you a pound to try.

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 08 October 2023

Thanks for the offer Keith. I only shot three groups with the Rel 7 I have and that was just to get a quick impression of its accuracy and to sort out the grains/velocity for future use. To be honest I didn't give it a fair shake. Bill.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

muley posted this 08 October 2023

you say loading at the bench . years ago Dave Lee used one case and loaded at the bench. he usually had highest score or was near the top. when you shoot the cases sort them as close as possible. reload as a group. I think ,shoulder pressure can also cause verticle. just my thoughts

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA President

John Alexander posted this 08 October 2023

Bill,

You call them groups and patterns and say your "groups" will age in the 8s but the group you show is .36, if I am reading it correctly, an extreme example of your "groups". The ratio between an .8 and the "pattern" shown is 1.5, a ratio that is very frequent in any string of 4 or five 5-shot groups. For that matter, the ratio of 3.4 of the two groups shown also isn't a rarity in strings of groups. This leads me to suspect that you don't have a (powder, powder position, shooting, case or any other such) problem. But instead are just expecting strings of 5 shot groups to be way more consistent that mother nature allows. This is just a guess andI could be off base because it is based on only the two groups shown.

How about posting the size of consecutive groups in a string of groups using the same load. Then you can judge if you are really seeing groups and patterns or just seeing the usual variation of ALL strings of 5 shot groups -- which none of us like but have to live with because there is no cure.

I tried to debunk the idea that a string of groups should be about the same size with evidence in my second article doubting the "tuning" that jacketed BR shooters think they do in TFS #275.

I would appreciate your, or any other reader's, comment on that article since I received zero feedback of any kind.

John

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

RicinYakima posted this 08 October 2023

John,

I think that you didn't get any feed back is because there are two opinionated groups; those that think small variations will make a big difference with consistent size and those of us who know that five shot groups vary greatly in size. You and JoeB did a lot to convince me of that.

Not meaning to break anyone's rice bowl, but there are a lot of products sold in shooting sports with little or no actual shooting data.

Four ten-shot groups would have less variation than four five-shot ones. And four 25-shot groups would be very close in overall size.

Ric

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 08 October 2023

John, the small group on the left was an outlier and I never paid much attention to that particular group or its size. My groups are rarely that small. But it does show the "group" v "pattern" dichotomy that I've been frustrated with.

Attached you'll see every group I shot since May. All are with the same mold, same powder. The powder charge varied from 19.6 (~1700) to 20.4 (~1760) and the COAL was from 2.940 to 2.979.

From May 4th through August 8th I shot 17 groups and had an agg of .752. I want to stress that that agg can not be compared to what I would have shot Kansas City. These groups were all shot in readable conditions over flags and on a 60 bench range that I've been shooting for over 30 years. It doesn't get any more "home field advantage" than that.

You can draw a line from August 21st on and make a case that something happened because the next thirty days (August 21 through September 21st) I shot 34 groups and agg'd 1.219. I was doing a lot of shooting during that stretch because after I left the range on August 21 I knew something was broke and I started to scramble around trying to figure out what was wrong so I could get things together enough to make the Nationals. Switching scopes, re-torquing action screws, etc; nothing brought things back into line. I've been getting the group v pattern thing every trip out since then.

What I call a group is 5 shots with a POI all in the same neighborhood of each other. To me, shooting cast groups in the .8's to 1.2's in readable conditions is a good group. When you shoot a group with a flier you don't appreciate it but you can understand it. But when every trip to the range has the same load / conditions shoot a group one time and 10 minutes later it shoots a non discernible pattern, you start to look for what's broke.

When it patterns it acts as if conditions got significantly worse and someone took away my flags. Or to put it another way it was as if the intended 20.0 grain of powder was a random mix of loads that ran between 19 to 21 grains.

Sorry for all the crying about this. Its something technical and I'll eventually figure it out. I gotten a lot of help from the above responses and I'll get it sorted out. I just needed to vent. I was rather disappointed I wasn't able to meet some of you at the Nationals. Bill.

Here are the groups I shot from May though end of September. You can see where things went wrong after the first week in August.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

CBA Member

Bud Hyett posted this 08 October 2023

Three thoughts:

Have you considered the barrel is losing its golden edge of accuracy? This can happen suddenly. This circumstance occurred at the Washington State Championship Match about a decade ago. Saturday the Savage .308 12BVSS shot well placing Alice in a position to win. Sunday morning the rifle would predictably group four or five shots, then throw a definite flyer out in the white, even outside the scoring rings. Watching the bullets go down the range, the flyers were creating a wake noticeably bigger. Visually checking the bore after cleaning, the rifling did not look as sharp. Checking the bore with a borescope that evening, the rifling was definitely worn in the throat. (Back to Savage for a new factory barrel.) To check this, shoot in the early morning with the Sun at your back and have a spotter watch the wake as the bullet goes downrange.

Many people report their best group their rifles shoot as the standard. The standard is what you expect the rifle to do every shot. A person should shoot ten-shot groups, at least five groups, establishing the expected group they will get in competition. If this group will give a clean score, then adopt it and practice under bad wind conditions. Judging wind and mirage effects are as important as the grouping capability of the rifle.

Does this rifle predictably throw the wide shots? This could be the barrel heating up in an uneven pattern. You can counter this. Either shoot the shots in the berm or hold off when shooting. I had a Trapdoor that reliably shot every eighth shot out at 2 o'clock in the eight ring with smokeless powder. (Lube purging?) In the informal practice matches at Windhill at the eighth shot, I'd hold at eight o'clock in the eight ring to usually get a nine or ten. Several old-time single-shot shooters at the turn of the last century tracked each shot in practice and held off in competition per their records.

Farm boy from Illinois, living in the magical Pacific Northwest

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Mal in au posted this 08 October 2023

I used 30 gns Varget no filler Lyman 311644 BV mold 20 bn Lino would consistently go Moa @ 100 mts, The rifle was a Schultz & Larsen mod.62 Qlympic 300 mt rifle. Tried 1/2 gn of Dacron filler to begin with was ok, decided to leave it out of the last 10 rnds. Bingo!! Have just parted with the S&L !! No matches being shot here these days for cast pills. Moving into PCP. Air rifles for a new challenge. Cheers Mal in au.

Attached Files

Standard Member

MP1886 posted this 08 October 2023

I used 30 gns Varget no filler Lyman 311644 BV mold 20 bn Lino would consistently go Moa @ 100 mts, The rifle was a Schultz & Larsen mod.62 Qlympic 300 mt rifle. Tried 1/2 gn of Dacron filler to begin with was ok, decided to leave it out of the last 10 rnds. Bingo!! Have just parted with the S&L !! No matches being shot here these days for cast pills. Moving into PCP. Air rifles for a new challenge. Cheers Mal in au.

Hey Mal, glad to meet you. Hey Schultz & Larsen use to make a rifle chambered for one of their cartridges that I always thought was better then the 7mm Remingtoin Magnum and that is the 7mm Schultz & Larsen. Fine rifle and cartridge.

Sorry to hear there's not cast pills matches down your way. Have fun with that air rifle.....Cheers Tony in the Deep South U.S.A.

Attached Files

CBA President

John Alexander posted this 09 October 2023

Bill,

Thanks for posting the list of groups. When 17 groups average X and the next 34 average 1.5X that certainly isn't group to group variation as I guessed. I have had the same thing happen sometimes with two weeks of shooting X followed by two weeks averaging 1.5X. Don't know the answer but my best guesses are 1, losing the groove for shooting a light rifle or 2, some sort of semi-permeant bore condition not remedied by routine bore cleaning aka magic. I think I have seen that blasting a dozen full charge JB loads has changed things back to X - but that may also be magical thinking on my part.

But when someone says small group followed two groups (or ten minutes) later by one three times larger we are likely seeing just typical group to group variation for 5-shot groups. Look at the individual group sizes in the 5 groups of an IBS aggregate and you will find that the ratio of largest group to smallest is often 3 or more -- sometimes by the winner. We seem to be able to quickly forget that happened or blame it on a bad shot, but it is just nature's way of telling us it is a probabilistic world whether we like it or not.

John

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 09 October 2023

Ric

there are two opinionated groups; those that think small variations will make a big difference with consistent size and those of us who know that five shot groups vary greatly in size.

Fully agree. Its the agg that matters, nothing else. Winning a small group award and not finishing near the top is like kissing your sister. What bugs me is that I shot 17 five shot groups in a row that agg'd in the .7's and the next 17 agg'd in the 1.2's. Thats what led me to believe that something was broken.

Bud said

Have you considered the barrel is losing its golden edge of accuracy?

It doesn't look like thats the problem. I've got 1114 cast rounds plus foulers through the barrel now. Zero jacketed. Its bore scoped after every range trip to look for fouling and general barrel condition. It still looks sharp.

Many people report their best group their rifles shoot as the standard.

I wouldn't be concerned a wit if all of 51 recorded groups agg'd in the 1.2's. It was the sudden breakdown after the first week in August when I went from decent group that agg'd in the .7's to the 1.2's.

Does this rifle predictably throw the wide shots? This could be the barrel heating up in an uneven pattern. You can counter this. Either shoot the shots in the berm or hold off when shooting. I had a Trapdoor that reliably shot every eighth shot out at 2 o'clock in the eight ring with smokeless powder.

I thought barrel heat or dirty barrel was my ticket out of jail for a period. I went to tracking the number of shots fired group by group since the last cleaning. Current practice is load and shoot one or two group at a time. So I can rule out barrel overheating and/or a dirty barrel. I had enough data that showed that cleaning every 17 to 23 rounds didn't trash the group size. In other words, groups shot after cleaning did not need a break in period. As is I can go to record after two fouling shots. When shooting groups I can call fliers when they happen. Once a group patterns there could be three or more shots that fling out of the group.

Next trip out I want to try a series of powder charges (still 5744; 19.6, 20.0, 20.4) with one group having the powder shifted toward the bullet and then repeat with the powder pretty much centered and level in the case by rolling them on my bench mat before chambering/loading.

If that doesn't work it back to playing musical chairs with powders and mold selection.

This year Bob Haufschild and Robert Olson both shot sub MOA with a .308 in Producion class. I don't have the experience they have and probably not the bench skills but I have an A+ personality, I'm stubborn and I have a touch of OCD going on. If I live long enough I'll get it sorted out. The one sure thing is that you learn a lot sorting out problems like this. Thanks to all, Bill.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

RicinYakima posted this 09 October 2023

You show 50 groups in in 5 months. That is not enough practice, you need to shoot the same load and bullet and settings more.

Last time I shot with Bob Haufschild, he told me he shot 25,000 rounds in less than ten years practicing. When I was getting ready for scoped Military Rifle Nationals, I would shoot 400 - 500 rounds between the middle of April and the first of June when I had to start driving. I tried to make every shot like make or break match winner.

FWIW

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA President

John Alexander posted this 09 October 2023

"but I have an A+ personality, I'm stubborn and I have a touch of OCD going on. If I live long enough I'll get it sorted out. The one sure thing is that you learn a lot sorting out problems like this. Thanks to all, Bill."

Sounds like you have the right personality and attitude.

Some additional thoughts, although I suspect you have already tried them.

I have never had any luck when things went south with diddling with small powder charges or powder changes. I have had real trouble when changing lots of 5744. If I understand correctly it has been made by several plants over the years.

You don't even mention alloy in your table so I assume, like many top shooters it is linotype. I would try something somewhat softer for a few groups. If you do it may be wise to guard against the case sizing or damaging the softer alloy

Cases change as they work harden and more if annealed. I would check a few dummy round to make sure it comes out of the chamber the same length as it went in.

I would seat and pull a few bullets to make sure they weren't being "sized" or otherwise damaged during seating.

I don't think it is likely that a linotype nose would upset to a larger diameter while being seated but you might check to be sure.

Are the land marks or absence of such on the nose the same on an extracted round as they were when shooting the small groups?

Good luck.

John

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

lotech posted this 09 October 2023

As for bullet hardness, as John Alexander touched on, I remember advice from Glenn Latham in THE FOULING SHOT years ago... I don't recall his exact words. but the basic message regarding bullet hardness was to use the softest bullet that would handle the load/ velocity without leading the bore. This would usually provide best accuracy. Generally, I've found this to be excellent advice.

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Lucky1 posted this 10 October 2023

I'll take the proverbial 'bullet' on this one. I'm very human and prone to error, some larger than others. So there are days I'm really on and days that won't give me a break. Last Nationals case in point. Got a third in the Little Bore with the 233 on Fri. Since it's both group and score, I was really pumped for the rest of the weekend. Saturday and Sunday was the plague of constant flyers etc that just made this match an endurance test. Same rifles, same loads, same shooter. I know better than to blame the rifle or load. The only way I'd be willing to go there would be shooting with a machine rest in a tunnel to reduce operator error. So John talking a 1.5 rule makes a lot more sense to me now and I'd be happy with some days to get it that close. I'm not the only one to go to the range and have a load and rifle do way worse than the week before and then work great the next time. Summary time- this game has so many variables it is hard to pin it down to one particular thing; especially with the human factor. One variable not mentioned so far is temperature changes over a season. With no chronograph readings I wonder about some changes going on there as well.

Scott Ingle

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

OU812 posted this 10 October 2023

During testing i use bipod and put consistent forward pressure on stock and shoulder. This takes away all the jitter of reticle before shot. Also i clean barrel after 20 shots. BTW I am still searching for consistent on demand 1/2" groups.

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

Mike H posted this 10 October 2023

I missed what rifle action you are using,but if any of it’s action screws are blind,check that they are not bottoming out when tightening.

Attached Files

CBA Member

Bud Hyett posted this 10 October 2023

Next trip out I want to try a series of powder charges (still 5744; 19.6, 20.0, 20.4) with one group having the powder shifted toward the bullet and then repeat with the powder pretty much centered and level in the case by rolling them on my bench mat before chambering/loading.

Try lightly tapping the case head three times on the bench and carefully inserting the case into the chamber to maintain the powder against the primer. When I was shooting Production, I did this for the .308. I think powder against the case head next to the primer is better.

Note: I found this to help when shooting ground squirrels with a Ruger .30 Carbine revolver on a hillside many years ago. Downhill I was shooting under, uphill I was shooting above, and across the hill I was hitting them (sometimes). Back to the measured range at fifty yards confirmed my suspicions. I held the revolver straight down and carefully lifted to have the powder in front, then straight up and carefully held the powder against the primer. The results on the target clearly showed the powder position affected velocity. Powder placement in the case does have an effect with less than full case loads.

Farm boy from Illinois, living in the magical Pacific Northwest

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

OU812 posted this 11 October 2023

You can tilt the barrel up between shots to settle powder. I once had to do this using 2400 powder in the 223...lots of work...too much work...,so I now use Titegroup to eliminate powder position problem.

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 11 October 2023

John, thanks:

I have had real trouble when changing lots of 5744. If I understand correctly it has been made by several plants over the years.

I'm still using the same lot of 5744 as I was shooting in the spring but appreciate your heads up about the different manufacturing locations. Maybe I'm the exception but it isn't often that I get two bottles of powders, different lots, that shoot the same way.

I would try something somewhat softer for a few groups. If you do it may be wise to guard against the case sizing or damaging the softer alloy

Both the case and the alloy could be something to work with. As is I've been shooting the same bach of Linotype since early spring. The brass has about 5 to 7 firings by now. I should be keeping track of that but didn't. I haven't had to set the shoulder back yet with the mild loads (~1720fps) I'm shooting. I neck size and don't put much squeeze on the bullet. If I remember right I'm sizing to .335, bullet sized to .308, necks turned to .0145.

I have multiples of the same Accurate Egan style molds. One drops a nose of .3012 and one .3018. The chamber & bore on the Savage is unusual. The freebore is only .3085 and the bore is pretty big at .3019. With the .3019 mold I can feel the nose touching the lands when chambering and I can feel the kiss (about .045" worth) of the Egan tapered front driving band enter the freebore. But it is not sticking or jamming. Extraction of a loaded round comes out easy and gentle with no pulling out or pushing in. There are signs of the lands touching the nose and the freebore but its not heavily engraved. Consider that this is coming from a rookie cast bullet accuracy shooter but seems like a good bullet to bore fit. Understanding bullet fit has been my biggest challenge.

I missed what rifle action you are using,but if any of it’s action screws are blind,check that they are not bottoming out when tightening.

Mike it's a straight up Savage short action with the HS Precision stock Savage sold with it some time back. It's torqued down to the 60lb as recommended and there's no barrel to stock contact.

Try lightly tapping the case head three times on the bench and carefully inserting the case into the chamber to maintain the powder against the primer.

Bud, I'll let you know about the tapping idea. If the heaven permits I'll be at the range in the next couple days. I'll have a backup bullet and a few other powders to try if the powder positioning doesn't effect change. I tried N135 a while back when I was trying to get 1800+ fps but at 1775 it was spraying like a water hose. Varget is the go to powder for jacketed bullet for F class but I honestly never gave it a try. The current plan is to give 4227 and 4895 another try. Maybe bring some 4198 along as well. That should about cover the fast to slow powders.

Its feels as if you took a trigger assembly apart a month ago and today you're trying to put it back together again. You know you'll eventually get it together but you have to keep working at it. Hard to explain all this as fun, but it is. Thanks, Bill.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

RicinYakima posted this 11 October 2023

Shooting cast bullets is an art form, not a science.

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

MP1886 posted this 11 October 2023

From a Chinese artist:

There is so much science in art.

Perspective is science. Color theory is science. Proportion is science. Anatomy is science. And that’s just the basics. I’m not even talking about pigment making, canvas treatment. My oil painting studio back in art school smell like turpentine all year long.

And that is just traditional art. Digital art involves even more science. People literally write codes to create art.

I have been doing art for decades. And a big chunk of that time is used to learn “How” and “Why”. How to create a piece of art so it turns out the way I envisioned it in my head. Learn to interpret a piece of art so I understand the “why”.

Attached Files

CBA Member

RicinYakima posted this 11 October 2023

MP 1886,

I trained, studied and spent the lasts 18 years of my working life as a environmental chemist.

There is no judgment or opinion in science. It deals with facts. Now if you know the facts, you can make better judgements and develop opinions. We use science to make art. Otherwise every picture would look the same.

IMHO, Ric

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

JeffinNZ posted this 11 October 2023

MP 1886,

There is no judgment or opinion in science. It deals with facts.

IMHO, Ric

I think what Ric means is that TRADITIONALLY and IN THE PAST this applied. I am inclined to think in our modern world it is no longer the case.

Cheers from New Zealand

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

Bud Hyett posted this 11 October 2023

"I think what Ric means is that TRADITIONALLY and IN THE PAST this applied. I am inclined to think in our modern world it is no longer the case." - Do not confuse the scientist who collects data and interprets his findings with the politically motivated view of the project leader satisfying the sponsors and continuing the funding. The proper structure of a scientific project negates this result. In our time, many projects being funded by governmental agencies brings a strong political factor into the published data.

Like Ric, I am classically trained in the scientific process with additional training in Project Management (Master of Science in Project Management - a specialized MBA). One quickly learns the political influences within corporate structure are a part of any project planning. Our team reporting dealt with facts and data supporting our conclusions and basis for conclusions.

I now read all public reports of any project with a jaundiced view.

Farm boy from Illinois, living in the magical Pacific Northwest

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Mal in au posted this 11 October 2023

MP1886 G,day Tony,

I still shoot cast in my 2 .303s in the military matches,I still own a couple of .308s and plink cast for fun! We tried to get cast matches going at one of the clubs I am a member, some interest but soon faded ,not helped by the shortage of components here in OZ, primers are almost non existent ,faster powders the same! Rifle powder 2207(4198) 2208(Varget) can be had.Pistol shooters were resorting to buying shot shells and disassembling using the powder.Still waiting for the RAW HM1000x to turn up,.22 cal.at least I can still buy air and don’t need a primer!! Having to ration out components is a pain,my son and I have to share what we have left. Cheers from Sunny Adelaide SA (OZ). Mal.

Attached Files

CBA President

John Alexander posted this 11 October 2023

Geez Bill,

You have about everything covered. It sure looks like something changed 8/21, but what? Try putting a little Kroil on the bullet nose. They say the evil fairies that ride cast bullets and steer them away from the center of the group don't like the smell of Kroil.

When you get it figured out you may be able tell me why my rifle shot as well as it every has on Friday winning the little bore match with room to spare, then not winning a single aggregate when it counted on Saturday and Sunday at the nationals. Same everything except where the holes appeared.

John

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 12 October 2023

Well......this is kind of embarrassing. But here goes.

The problem was self inflicted which (assuming you are a glass half full kind of person) was better to find out at my range than pulling out my hair at a match. The primary objective for the range trip today was to see if the 5744 powder position within the case had an effect on what I've been calling group v patterns. A secondary objective was to try a couple different powders and another bullet.

Conditions were interesting. Wind direction ran from 4:00 to 8:00 and wind velocity ran from a few moment of "A" to strong "C's". I break down wind velocity to alpha characters A, B, C, D. "A" being mild and "D" is with the flag tail held up there right tall and proud. So conditions were tough enough I could only run a couple, three shots then pick the rest. I haven't practiced holding off with shooting cast bullets with wind change because of the iffy "patterns" I was getting.

Now to take ownership for the self inflicted wound. Back in early August I put a cartridge block on my front rest. A cartridge block is elevated off the bench and is in close proximity to the loading port on the action. I've shot in this manner for decades and it helps me when I run (versus pick) a group. When conditions are right I try to put 5 down range as fast as I can. With jacketed PPC that's about 11 seconds. And most competitors were faster than me. We actually practiced how fast we could put 5 shots on record. The theory is that you're trying to shoot a decent aggregate not a tiny group. So when conditions are right you let it fly. I'm too new to know if that's common to cast accuracy.

Now the cartridge block holds the cartridge at about a 45 degree angle so its position so you can pick it as soon as your hand leaves the bolt (RB/RP).

With the angle of the cartridge as held in the block it tilted the case and it had the powder shifting toward the base of the bullet. Today the test groups shot with the cartridge block shot the same "patterns" I've been whining about. I switched back and forth between loading off the cartridge block and loading with the cartridges laying on the bench which had the powder pretty much level in the case.

The two groups on the left were loaded from the cartridge bloc and the powder was in the upset condition. The two on the right were loaded from the bench.

What I found was that 5447 is sensitive to its position in the case. Which opens up a whole new question about powder selection for the .308. None of the powders that I can see will even half fill the case. I would assume that some powders burn more efficiently than others. So when you are shooting honest "groups" and that group includes a flier (which doesn't disqualify it from being a group in my mind) is the flier caused by the powder position? John started a thread some months back with the title something like "What causes fliers". Never though about it since this circus I just waded through but powder combustion could maybe be a great excuse. Good shooters always have to have a couple, three canned excuses when a group is blown. They don't call it the wailing wall for nothing.

So the 5744 is going back on the shelf. The IMR 4227 looked promising and maybe it's shorter extruded power helps ignition. Its only a guess but with more surface area exposed it may burn more consistently? Knowledge about that is above my pay grade. Thanks to everyone, Bill.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 12 October 2023

good stuff ... which targets are which position ... ?

in the short term, for research purposes, it would be interesting to try the puffy dacron filler trick with the 5744.

i have been having great luck in my 308 Tikka with 700X at short range ... ... but i think 1700+ fps for 200 yard shots are above it's range. wonder if blue dot or herco ... would be the Goldilocks powder ... nobody seems to use it tho ...

i haven't shot 4227 in a big case for years but I remember it as being location sensitive ... as was 2400 ... my best results with those 2 was with the puffy dacron ...that was with 280 rem and 30-06 trying for groups ... then i sold my soul to plinking and went to red dot, unique, and 700X ...

really enjoying your adventures ... please keep them up ... ken

Attached Files

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 12 October 2023

Sorry about not identifying that. The left ones were from the loading block and the right were from the bench. All four had fliers but the difference was that the loads out of the loading block went out further then the fliers off the bench. This is all new to me and I totally missed the obvious fact that a half case of powder could be kind of important. I might try the Dacron as an option. Do you remember how many grains you used? Thanks for the heads up on the sensitivity of the 4227.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Liked by

CBA Member

RicinYakima posted this 12 October 2023

You are correct, as I went to University in 1966. I guess I am just an old out of the times fogey.

Attached Files

Standard Member

OU812 posted this 12 October 2023

Do you bump your bullets more round or do you shoot as cast. From my experience targets looks like as cast.

I bet that big bullet kicks shoulder pretty good

Attached Files

Standard Member

OU812 posted this 12 October 2023

I can send you some bullets to test. I had a custom mould made by accurate moulds and made a special bump die to bump rounds more round. I never tested this bullet because I never purchased barrel or rifle to shoot them in. You can see picture of bullet If you go to the gallery section of forum, click on bullets cartridges and more, picture 4 of 57. Bullet weighs about 180 grain...easier on shoulder.

Attached Files

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 12 October 2023

They are "as cast". I'm pretty illiterate when it comes to bumping bullets. Wanted to ask if anyone knew an article in FS that had some information about it. Not much recoil now that I finally learned how to take it. Coming from free recoil, 2 oz trigger to Production Class cast took some adjusting. Rattled my glasses a couple times until I figured out where the stock ended and my shoulder began.

Funny thing about the differences between loading from the loading block and loading from the bench with the 5744. From the loading block I think I could shoot groups all day long between 1.0" and 2.50". And outside of the flier now and then I think loading cartridges laying flat on the bench I could cut that by 40%. Again, as a disclaimer: my range, my conditions. Full home field advantage. Thanks again to everyone who kept me leaning into the problem. Bill.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

CBA President

John Alexander posted this 12 October 2023

You didn't mention the two extra bullet holes in the lower right target. Just curious.

John

Attached Files

CBA Member

Ken Campbell Iowa posted this 12 October 2023

mr cook .. puffy dacron ... i just used only enough to hold the powder against the primer ...didn't weigh it ... i doubt the actual weight ... as far as Mass goes ... makes any difference, but the density is pretty light ... only enough to do the job for bench shooting .... not intended for 3 seasons of deer hunting ....

i think i bought my pack of dacron at walmart ... i just pull it out to thin it ... maybe * a wisp * of dacron describes it ... heh ... i always wondered if i was coating my barrels with melted plastic, but i shot hundreds of loads with no noticeable buildup ... my cleaning is just a couple passes of brushes with 4x steel wool ... if no lead ... and there never is ... then a slightly wet rag of essentially Eds Red ...

in my earlier post mentioning dacron i referred to ShortTerm interest ... using fillers is probably just a dead end side tunnel down the rabbit hole ... but maybe if your groups improve from that it will be a clue ...

also Larry Gipson has posted here a couple times mentioning these puffy fillers ... might do a search for those posts ...

ken

Attached Files

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 12 October 2023

John, the flier was from another group. I shot groups at 19.6, 20.0 and 20.4. I wrote off the 20.4 out of hand because I had experience with bigger groups when I went up in powder. History favored the 19.6 and the 20.0g loads for accuracy.. Depending on how conditions were, sometimes 19.6 out shot the 20.0g and vice versa. In cases when the 19.6 went vertical, 20.0g brought it back just like it should. Sometimes 19.6 (approximately 1730fps) stuck like it should.

More powder than that (20.4 - 22.0) consistently got some groups.

If I were doing my part, the four and one's with the powder level in the case will out shoot the 4 and 1's (or 3 and 2"s) that were shot with the powder in an unbalanced condition. On a normal range trip I would have stayed in the 19.6 to 20.0 range and concentrated on the wind. I haven't had the confidence to lean into the wind since early August.

In hindsight I think what I was calling patterns were really 3 and 2's, or 2 and 3's. Shots that went out that I couldn't account for. I can deal with that for one range trip. But after 7 weeks of seeing the 2 and 3's or the 2, 2', and 1's was a bit too much.

Then there is the possibility that I am just looking to put closure to the problem and I should stick with 5744. Too bad the number of days left for me isn't as great as my appetite to dig deeper. I can see two fliers on all three of the groups on the left. So did the three groups on the right but they didn't go out as far. But my agg's for the first 17 groups shot with rounds laid on the bench were under MOA and the groups shot from the cartridge block (assuming powder upset condition) were over that by 1/2". In a four group match that's find by me. I can even tolerate a 2x group in match conditions because things happen. But over the course of 50 groups patterns develop.

In my mind I can see the formation of groups on all three of the right side targets. And I can see the three on the left close to or into an upset condition.

Then again, sometimes we can sell ourselves on most anything we want to believe.

John, I would appreciate your straight from the shoulder opinion.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

CBA President

John Alexander posted this 12 October 2023

Bill,

No doubt something changed on 8/21 and it looks like you have found it with Bud's suggestion. Congratulations.

Being leery that mother nature likes to play tricks; If were me, I wouldn't celebrate until after a few more groups but so far so good.

John

Attached Files

CBA Member

Paul Pollard posted this 12 October 2023

Attached is a target from a previous National. It hangs on the loading room wall and makes me chuckle when I look at it. No two consecutive shots were close on the sighter, and I finally just decided to move up to the record target.

200 yd target

Attached Files

Liked by

Standard Member

Wm Cook posted this 13 October 2023

in my earlier post mentioning dacron i referred to ShortTerm interest ... using fillers is probably just a dead end side tunnel down the rabbit hole ... but maybe if your groups improve from that it will be a clue ...

Ken I agree. Sometimes you just have to change something to make it better or worse to sort out the cause.

Being leery that mother nature likes to play tricks; If were me, I wouldn't celebrate until after a few more groups but so far so good.

Yeah, I know. Been down that path too often. Often a flush of success is like a bell ringing and they rush to the exit door. After second, thrid thoughts and as much as I hate to do it, I think I need to put together another round of test with the 5744 before I stop using the powder.

Attached is a target from a previous National.

Paul I would have paid $20 to be standing behind you with a spotting scope watching you and the flags while you were working through the sighter, then going on recored. The best statement back at the loading room would have been that you had it all planned out. That the sighter rounds were used for nothing more than to sort out all the variables before you went to record. First relay on Sunday mornings huh?

I think there must be someting having to do to powder granular size and how efficient it works. Take care all and thanks, Bill.

A “Measured Response” is as effective as tongue lashing a stuck door.

Attached Files

Standard Member

Qc Pistolero posted this 15 October 2023

Has anyone had any experience with using Dacron filler with the slower "fast" burning powders? 4227, 4198, 4895, 5744?

I've had some good results using Dacron with 4227 and 4198.Not always but I'd say more than 50% of times it was positive.Quite the contrary with 5744(BTW this powder is notorious for leaving unburnt granules;using mag primer and a heavy crimp will reduce them but it doesn't seem to affect accuracy)4895 I've never used a filler since I don't consider it a medium burning powder and I use a filler only with such.